ProdagoClear the evidence review bottleneck
For the teams who own controls and the evidence attached to them: receive evidence in the expected form, review it against the control, faster, with a result you can trace. The reviewer decides; the platform prepares.
Request a demoThe answer depends on the reviewer, the day and the volume. Consistency is expected, and hard to demonstrate.
Each return trip costs a week. Without a precise finding, the submitter guesses what was missing.
Everything looks equally important, so nothing gets prioritized, and the backlog is managed by seniority of the requester.
Each control carries the evidence it requires and the template for it, so what arrives is what was asked for, in the expected form.
Each piece of evidence is pre-assessed against the control’s requirements: located, verified, and graded (pass, partial, fail, not found), with the reason and the trace to the requirement text. The reviewer starts from a finding, not from a blank page.
Who produces, who reviews, who approves, per control, in a matrix that the whole organization sees. No ambiguity about whose turn it is.
Reviews prioritized by risk and by what they block; derogations requested, justified, declined or approved on a defined path.
The state of every control and its evidence, across initiatives, for the second line, the third line and the committee.
The controls, the evidence and the validations are pre-built in our playbooks, from the regulations and policies your controls come from. The judgment stays with your reviewers.
Fewer return trips, reviews that start from findings, and a queue that moves.
Consistent decisions across reviewers, explainable to the submitter and to the auditor.
A complete audit trail per control: what was submitted, what was found, who decided.
Governance that is already built, automated end to end, so your AI ambition moves at the speed you intended.
Request a demo